March 3, 2006
The South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Board today urged the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to significantly strengthen its
proposal for new health standards for fine particulate pollution.
“EPA’s current proposal will not adequately protect public health,” said
William Burke, Ed.D., Governing Board Chairman of the South Coast Air
Quality Management District. “We think EPA should follow the
recommendations of its own expert panel and adopt standards that will
provide an adequate margin of safety for our most vulnerable residents.”
AQMD’s Governing Board today directed its staff to submit a formal
comment letter to EPA detailing AQMD’s concerns about the proposed air
quality standard.
At issue is the degree to which EPA’s Proposed National Ambient Air
Quality Standard for Particulate Matter will strengthen – and in some cases
drop – health standards for particulates known as PM10, PM2.5 and PM10-2.5.
( PM10 refers to particles smaller than 10 microns in diameter; PM2.5 to
those smaller than 2.5 microns and PM10-2.5 to those in between 10 microns
and 2.5 microns in size. One micron represents one-millionth of one meter.
A human hair is typically about 70 microns in diameter.)
In its comment letter to EPA, AQMD will outline three main areas of
concern:
- The proposal does not follow the recommendation of EPA staff or
that of EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC).
Numerous studies have linked PM2.5 levels below the current standard to
serious adverse health effects, including increased risk of cardiovascular
disease and decreased lung function in children. The U.S. EPA’s own
science advisory committee stated that lowering both the 24-hour average
and the annual average standards for PM2.5 is necessary to protect public
health. AQMD’s review concluded that only the most health-protective
standard should be adopted.
- The proposal establishes for the first time a national standard
that treats urban and rural areas differently. Review of health
studies support a new federal standard for coarse particles in the
PM10-PM2.5 range, although little information is known about the toxicity
of specific components of this particle size. EPA’s proposal would exempt
areas where wind-blown dust, and agriculture and mining sources, are the
predominant components of the particulate mix. Even in areas where the
standard applies, these sources would be exempt from controls to meet the
standard. Studies conducted in the Coachella Valley area of Riverside
County have shown adverse health effects from coarse PM. This area is
heavily impacted by sources of coarse PM that would be excluded in EPA’s
proposed new standard.
- The proposal establishes criteria for air monitoring sites that
would not provide adequate information to assess health impacts in rural
areas. AQMD opposes EPA’s proposal to place monitors in areas that
would exclude measurement of re-suspended particulate matter from
agricultural and mining sources. While EPA claims there is insufficient
health data to continue such monitoring, EPA’s proposal would only
perpetuate the lack of information in this area.
The following table summarizes the current federal PM standards, EPA’s
proposal and AQMD recommendations.
Current/Proposed/Recommended PM Standards
|
Pollutant |
Averaging Period |
Current Standards |
Proposed Standards |
|
|
|
Federal |
State |
EPA Recommended Standard |
AQMD Recommendation |
|
PM10 |
Annual |
50 µg/m3 |
20 µg/m3 |
Rescind
standard |
Support
continuation of standard |
|
|
24-hr |
150 µg/m3 |
50 µg/m3 |
Retain in
metro areas violating standard until PM10-2.5 areas
designated |
Support
continuation of standard |
|
PM2.5 |
Annual |
15 µg/m3 |
12 µg/m3 |
15 µg/m3
(no change) |
12 µg/m3 |
|
|
24-hr |
65 µg/m3 |
None |
35 µg/m3 |
30 µg/m3 |
|
PM10-2.5 |
24-hr. |
None |
None |
70 µg/m3* |
50 µg/m3
– No exemptions |
* Excludes
areas impacted by windblown dust, as well as agriculture and mining
Particulate matter is a complex mix of microscopic particles from myriad
sources including diesel soot, tire dust, soil and condensation of
combustion gases. When inhaled, fine particles are readily trapped deep in
lung tissues and even transferred to the blood stream. They have emerged as
one of the greatest health threats from air pollution and are associated
with a wide range of health effects from increased hospital visits to
exacerbation of respiratory diseases including asthma, and premature deaths.
Although the Southland is close to complying with the federal PM10
standard, the area continues to have the highest PM2.5 levels in the nation.
EPA must finalize new PM standards by Sept. 27 as a result of a lawsuit by
environmental groups and a subsequent court-ordered consent decree.
AQMD is the air pollution control agency for Orange County and major
portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside counties.
-#- |